Leave a comment

America’s debate coach, Brett O’Donnell wrote on the key pivot points in tonight’s throwdown.

Tonight, President Barack Obama and former governor Mitt Romney will step  onto the stage for the first of perhaps the most consequential series of  presidential debates in American history.

What is at stake is only matched by the premium Americans have grown to place on the art of political debate itself. Most Americans believe that debate is as  much a part of the fabric of American politics as our first elections, but in  reality general-election presidential debates are a relatively recent  phenomenon, the first televised battles between Kennedy and Nixon also being the  first debates between the nominees of the major parties. We have come to treat  debates as part of the gauntlet that candidates must traverse and the one place  to satisfy our desire for competition. And so we pay careful attention to the  attacks and counterattacks, who can land the better body blows and if either can  score a knockout punch through a clever line or zinger.

The Republican primary season only served to ratchet up those expectations.  Michele Bachmann (full disclosure: I worked for her) knocked out Tim Pawlenty.  Rick Perry knocked himself out. And the battles between Newt Gingrich and Romney  were the stuff high-school debaters dream about. But lost in all of the  metaphors of competition is a fight over the direction of the country. While  millions will tune in to see which of their gladiators wins the duel, what  should not be lost is what we learn about these two men and the direction each  would take the country over the next four years.

Both are competing for a small slice of undecided voters in 10 states. But  both are also attempting to inspire their own bases to turn out in November. So  both will have to walk the “tightrope” of being respectfully  aggressive—particularly Romney, who must attack Obama without sullying the  office he holds.

We should pay particular attention to whether Romney can convince voters that  Obama is to blame for present economic conditions and that things are getting  worse—or if Obama can convince voters that we’re headed in the right direction  and that to change course now would endanger a fragile recovery. So far the  president is winning this argument by a razor-thin margin. The debates could  turn the tide significantly.

We should pay attention to who starts strong. The first 30 minutes of the  first debate are the most important. That will set in motion the narrative, and  help determine whom voters perceive to be winning the debates. It’s hard to  recover from a bad first outing. Remember President Bush in 2004, or then–vice  president Al Gore in 2000. Ronald Reagan was one of the few who recovered from a  poor first showing to win the second one in 1984, overcoming the perception he  was too old to be president.

In spite of the conventional wisdom otherwise, both men are highly skilled  orators. The candidate who is able to execute his strategy and clearly  communicate his message will triumph.

Also On Magic 95.9:
comments – Add Yours